12 angry men character analysis juror 8

12 Angry Men Analysis

Juror 7 Sports activities fan Jack port Warden A slick and sometimes obnoxious salesman, Juror 7 admits during Take action One which he would have done anything to miss jury responsibility. By the time he's finished, when everyone has clearly stopped listening, this trope—delivered by 4—is all it takes to shut him up for the rest of the movie.

When he was asked to clarify his decision he prompted the other jurors to view the case accessible in different ways. The broken relationship with his son preoccupies his thoughts at several times throughout the movie; he is found staring at the picture.

The most compelling realization for Juror 10 was when he, out of anger, expressed his hatred and bigotry through a monologue that engaged such embarrassment, hatred, and disgust from most of the jurors that they all started moving away and turned their backs while he was still talking.

The film may open hearts and change minds. All of this is supported by his body gestures and his rhetoric. This new understanding of himself enables him to think more clearly and objectively. Said by the defendant and later Juror 3, which gets thrown back in his face because he'd earlier claimed that people don't say something like that unless they mean it.

His smarts kick-start the plot. Juror 11 takes a moment to gush about the jury trial system, and how it could only happen in a democracy like the United States.

In this case, however, the rogue juror isn't actually convinced of the defendant's innocence at first. Juror 10 retreats to one when, after one of his racist rants goes too far, Juror 4 shuts him up.

12 Angry Men (1957)

Address the following questions. Their prejudices were less ingrained as the others, and they were more able to appeal to rationality and facts.

For these reasons, public votes may be doubted. Use APA format for in-text citations and references. As time passes, other jurors take up his strategies. In this scene he also cries out that he will "kill" 8, which supports one the argument of juror 8 you don't always suggest what you say and don't necessarily act accordingly.

Therefore it is also important that the first choice has learned what business the business is directly into avoid misguided work and lead his team correctly. As mentioned early on in the movie, he previously a strict dad what may impact his characteristics as a grown-up. Uh, wai-wait a minute, there's some people who haven't talked yet.Twelve Angry Men is set in New York inand the entire action of the play takes place on one hot afternoon and evening in the jury room of a court of law.

12 Angry Men - 8 Essay - Part 8. 12 Angry Men was one of the most critically acclaimed movies of its time, even gaining several Oscar nominations - 12 Angry Men - 8 Essay introduction.

The movie tugged into strings that in the course of watching the movie, or even after, continuously made me think. Juror #8: Look, there was one alleged eye witness to this killing.

12 Angry Men - 8 Essay - Part 8

Someone else claims he heard the killing, saw the boy run out afterwards and there was a lot of circumstantial evidence. Character Analysis On Juror 8 For 12 Angry Men. Reginald Rose’s ’12 Angry Men’ brings 12 jurors together in a room to decide whether a young foreign boy is guilty of killing his father.

What is the background of Juror Number Eight in Twelve Angry Men?

The play is interwoven with dynamic characterisation, striking symbolism and intense moments of drama. Juror Nine is an old man who wants justice. He quickly comes to Eight’s side and advocates what he says.

He plays a minor role in the story. 12 Angry Men is a film connected to the Western moral imagination, speaking to us on a primal, even a classical level, with themes that are as old as the Bible and Greek tsuki-infini.com characters of the twelve jurors are archetypes representing the virtues and vices .

12 angry men character analysis juror 8
Rated 5/5 based on 74 review